It takes a creative mind to take an old story and retell in a new and different way.
Quentin Tarantino‘s new movie, Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood, has just hit theaters. Set in Los Angeles in the late 1960’s, Rick Dalton’s (Leonardo DiCaprio) career was once red hot. But that limelight has faded. His best friend/assistant/former stunt double Cliff Booth (Brad Pitt) is always by his side. While Rick and Cliff try to revive their careers, Sharon Tate (Margot Robbie) is Hollywood’s latest it-girl. But there is danger lurking behind the bright lights and glittering facade. The Manson family is out to commit murder.
This is not the first time that Tarantino has played fast and loose with history. His 2009 film, Inglorious Basterdsalso played fast and loose with history. What I liked about this movie is that both Rick and Cliff are flawed and likable characters. They just want to return to the success they once had. As Sharon Tate, Margot Robbie tells the story of the real life woman, not the murder victim that we think of today.
If I had to name my favorite aspect of this film, it was the chilling effect of the scenes with the Manson family. Though we know now what plans they had in store, the general public knew nothing about the murders until it was headline news.
I recommend it.
Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood is presently in theaters.
Before I go any farther, I must state that I respect your right to speak your opinion as an American. I also respect your right to use your voice as an artist and a filmmaker to share your point of view.
However, that does not mean that I agree with you on your view of the police.
There is an old saying: “You can’t really understand another person’s experience until you‘ve walked a mile in their shoes”.
For you to make a blanket statement regarding every member of every police force across the country is wrong. Like any group, there is always one or two bad apples. But to condemn the police as a group and to accuse them of murder is wrong. It gives criminals a free pass to kill hard-working police men and women who risk life and limb to protect the average citizen.
I am not a fan of your movies, though I did enjoy Inglorious Basterds.
You have every right to speak and have your opinion heard. But that does not give you the right to agitate and incite. If I had any interest in seeing your next film (which I really had not considered previously), I have zero interest now.
Warning: May contain spoilers. Read at your own risk if you have not seen this movie.
Quentin Tarantino is known for making a very specific style of movie.
His 2009 not quite historically accurate World War II movie, Inglourious Basterds, is his own take on World War II.
The movie intertwines two different stories. Shosanna Dreyfus (Melanie Laurent) is a Jewish woman, whose family was murdered by Col Hans Landa (Christoph Waltz). Lt. Aldo Raine (Brad Pitt) is an American servicemen whose company consists all of Jewish-American soldiers. Their task is to kill Nazi soldiers.
Only escaping with the clothes on her back, Shosanna hides in Paris as the owner of a movie theater. Fredrick Zoller (Daniel Bruhl) is a Nazi soldier who is being turned into a hero by the Nazi propaganda machine. Zoller takes an interest in Shosanna, not knowing her true identity. The Nazis plan to use Shosanna’s theater to premiere the movie about their war hero and the Basterds see the opportunity to complete their assigned task.
Is this movie historically accurate? Other than the massacre of Shosanna’s family, no. It is a typical Tarantino movie blood and gore? Yes. But that is what makes it so good. Movies are meant to entertain us, and this movie is entertaining. And I will admit that as someone who lost family in the Holocaust, I can’t help but feel that the destruction of the movie theater is payback, if only on screen.